PharmaSources/Dishui SinanFebruary 03, 2020
Tag: formulations , NDEA , carcinogens , Carcinogens NDMA
The Center for Drug Evaluation, NMPA (CDE) released on its website the Technical Guidelines for the Research of Nitrosamine Impurities in Chemical Drugs (Draft for Comment) on Jan. 10, 2020 with the period of opinion solicitation of one month, which has made a splash and will be of far-reaching significance to the pharmaceutical industry as it will fill in gaps in China’s regulation and technical requirements for the research of nitrosamine impurities in chemical drugs. The industry has amplified calls for the technical control guidelines for the research of nitrosamine impurities in chemical drugs in recent years. This article analyzes the pain spots and highlights in the research of nitrosamine impurities in chemical drugs in the hope of providing some reference for the said research.
I. Pain spots in the research of nitrosamine (NDMA and NDEA) impurities
What triggered people to start to pay attention to nitrosamine (NDMA and NDEA) impurities was the valsartan event of Huahai Pharmaceutical in 2018. On July 5, 2018, the EU EMA announced on its website that some medicines produced with Huahai Pharmaceutical’s API valsartan would be recalled due to the detection of an impurity: N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in valsartan by Zhejiang Huahai. Following this, various nitrosamine impurities such as NDMA and N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) were detected in other sartan APIs. Further investigations discovered that nitrosamine impurities were also detected in non-sartan drugs (ranitidine) of individual suppliers. Nitrosamine impurities belong to the "cohort of concern" mentioned in the ICH guideline M7(R1) on assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk, and according to the World Health Organization’s list of carcinogens, NDMA and NDEA are Group 2A carcinogens, therefore, nitrosamine (NDMA and NDEA) impurities shall be strictly controlled in pharmaceutical products. Due to the low control limits and complex matrices of genotoxic impurities, it’s necessary to develop and use the quantitative detection methods with high sensitivity and high selectivity, and the development of the analytical methods needs to be fully prepared for the volatility, thermostability, chemical reaction characteristics, matrix characteristics and interference, etc. of genotoxic impurities. The CDE has actively conducted the corresponding exploration and research of the nitrosamine impurities in pharmaceutical products and will make continuous improvement based on the research results of all sides and the risk-benefit assessment principle; it has organized the drafting of the Warning on the Risk of Nitrosamine Compound Formation in the API Processes (Draft for Comment) and Technical Guidelines for the Research of Nitrosamine Impurities in Chemical Drugs (Draft for Comment) for the reference of the pharmaceutical industry and medical equipment and supplies manufacturing of China.
Date | Milestone |
Feb. 15, 2019 | The CDE organized the drafting of the Warning on the Risk of Nitrosamine Compound Formation in the API Processes on the basis of literature research and reaction mechanism analysis, to provide technical reference for the risk of nitrosamine compound formation in the API research and production. |
Jan. 10, 2020 | The CDE released on its website the Technical Guidelines for the Research of Nitrosamine Impurities in Chemical Drugs (Draft for Comment) to fill in gaps in China’s regulation and technical requirements for the research of nitrosamine impurities in chemical drugs. |
II. Which links may lead to nitrosamine (NDMA and NDEA) impurities?
As far as is known, there are many causes of nitrosamine impurity formation; specifically, nitrosamine impurities may be introduced via the following ways, such as the process, degradation, and contamination.
Source | Risk interpretation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. How to control nitrosamine (NDMA and NDEA) impurities?
The acceptable limits of nitrosamine impurities in humans are low and the detection and control of trace impurities are difficult, therefore, the control of nitrosamine impurities shall adopt the strategy of "based on avoidance, supplemented by control".
Item | Risk control measure interpretation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. Which cases can be used for reference regarding the limit control of nitrosamine (NDMA and NDEA) impurities?
(1) Case 1: Limits of nitrosamine impurities whose TD50 values are recommended by authoritative organizations
Generally, for mutagenic impurities with positive carcinogenicity data, the daily adequate intake (AI) is suggested to be calculated according to the TD50 values of carcinogenic substances in the CPDB. The TD50 value of NMDA in mice and rats is separately 0.189mg/kg/day and 0.0959mg/kg/day. Calculate people’s daily maximum AI of NDMA according to the more conservative TD50 value of rats: 0.0959mg/kg/day and the human weight of 50kg: 0.0959mg/kg/day×50kg/50000 =0.0000959mg/day≈96ng/day, corresponding to the tumor risk of 1/100,000. Calculated according to the daily maximum dosage of 320mg of valsartan, its NDMA limit is 96ng/320mg=0.00003%=0.30ppm.
(2) Case 2: Limits of nitrosamine impurities whose TD50 values are not found in the databases of authoritative organizations
No TD50 data of DIPNA and EIPNA are available in the CPDB at present. In line with the methodology suggested in ICH M7 chapter 7.5, carcinogenicity data from closely related structures may be used on a case-by-case basis. To identify closely related structures, an expert structure-activity relationship analysis (SAR) was performed. This analysis suggested that NDEA carcinogenicity data could be used to derive AI levels for DIPNA and EIPNA based on their close SAR and the alkyldiazonium ions formed. According to Sulc et al. (2010), alkyl N-nitrosamines are bio-transformed via α-hydroxylation with the release of carbonyl compounds to the corresponding alkyldiazonium ions being responsible for covalent modification of DNA. According to the daily dosage and medication cycle of valsartan, with reference to the calculation method in Case 1, the daily maximum AI of DIPNA or EIPNA by humans is 26.5ng/day, corresponding to the tumor risk of 1/100,000.
[1] National Medical Products Administration
Released on Jan. 10, 2020
NMPA Department of Comprehensive Affairs, Planning, and Finance Affairs Soliciting Public Opinions on the Technical Guidelines for the Research of Nitrosamine Impurities in Chemical Drugs (Draft for Comment)
Attachment: Technical Guidelines for the Research of Nitrosamine Impurities in Chemical Drugs (Draft for Comment)
NMPA Department of Comprehensive Affairs, Planning, and Finance Aff
References
[1] www.nmpa.gov.cn/WS04/CL2050/373332.html
About the author:
Dishui Sinan, male, Senior Biomedical Engineer, basing on the quality management work in the bio-medicine industry, focusing on the bio-medicine industry, and wishing to talk in simple language about the specialized knowledge that is not simple and provide a knowledge compass to guide readers in the sea of knowledge.
Contact Us
Tel: (+86) 400 610 1188
WhatsApp/Telegram/Wechat: +86 13621645194
Follow Us: