pharmatimesApril 28, 2019
Tag: AI , practice , physicians
Furthermore, fewer than one in five would use a voice controlled clinical decision support system that was offered by pharma, with 63% understandably citing concerns about bias and the handling of sensitive personal information.
The results have also reinforced the idea of human interaction as the ultimate diagnostic tool, showing that only a tiny minority of physicians think that AI could diagnose better than a human.
Only 19% of physicians say they would be comfortable using a voice-controlled smart speaker during a patient consultation, and when asked whether they would use a hypothetical voice controlled clinical support system, 48% claimed they would use a government institution made system, as opposed to just 18% made by a pharmaceutical company.
In 2018, Medscape asked similar questions to physicians and found that from 2018 to 2019, there was a decrease in the number willing to use a voice-controlled speaker to look up disease information, hear updates from conferences and check for drug interactions, showing a growing trend of distrust in AI.
Register as Visitor to CPhI China 2019!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Editor's Note:
To apply for becoming a contributor of En-CPhI.cn,
welcome to send your CV and sample works to us,
Email: Julia.Zhang@ubmsinoexpo.com.
Contact Us
Tel: (+86) 400 610 1188
WhatsApp/Telegram/Wechat: +86 13621645194
Follow Us: